Re: pull your finger out
FPS - BF:V v1.2, SW: Battlefront II, VC2, CoD2, F.E.A.R, Quake 4, CS: Source, DoD: Source, Brothers in Arms: EIB, Doom3 (with 32 player mod), FarCry, UT2K4, Rune: Halls of Valhalla
RTS - AoE3, Act of War, DoW: WA, War3
BF:V i dont mind but ppl get bored of it far too quickly, battlefront 2 i dont know but it sounds like a good idea, vc2 i can safely say is crap (and ppl will have jerky gameplay), cod2 has my thumbs up, FEAR i thought that was singleplayer?, Q4 is singleplayer aswell isnt it?, the Source games arent easy to get ppl, unless we have a cracked version (besides we play those all the time at home on the net anyway), BiA is a squad game not a true fps, and again isnt liked by all too many. Doom3 with 32 players? i like your thinking, it might give a good fun fast slasher deathmatch fps to the mix. I love your suggestion of farcry, it'll be 2006 by the time the lan is on if people cant run this game they seriously need to think upgrade or reconsider their lanning future. UT2K4 is good and fun but everyone bitches about the vehicles, something i learnt at previous lans( so no vehicle maps maybe?), and finally Rune wtf is that???
AoE3 that game is shit, Act of War - everyone needs a 5 gig image (so a bitch to get to ppl)to install it and afterthat ppl need to learn it, DoW WA and War 3 are easy to get easy to play and above all fun!
So that leaves (in my opinion) CoD2, Doom3, Farcry, Battlefront 2 maybe? DoW WA and War 3, and maybe UT2K4.
The reason the game list isnt as extensive is because theres a reason for it, or else the lan will just turn into endless moaning band bitching about not liking a game, getting pwned becasue the game is unfair, cant copy cos everyone else is, or 'my pc cant run it'.
people are free to play what they want, just singleplayer games we frown upon, but what the servers will be running will be simple well known games that everyone can get into.
